Cadillac ATS vs Lincoln MKZ Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2013 catalog dimensions. Cadillac ATS · Lincoln MKZ
- Length182.8 in
- Height55.9 in – 56.4 in
- Wheelbase109.3 in
- Curb weight3,358 lb – 3,537 lb
- Width71.1 in
- Lincoln MKZ width73.4 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Cadillac ATS is 11.3 in shorter (182.8 in vs 194.1 in)
- Width: Cadillac ATS is 2.3 in narrower (71.1 in vs 73.4 in)
- Height: Lincoln MKZ is 2.0 in taller (56.1 in vs 58.2 in)
- Wheelbase: Lincoln MKZ has a 2.9 in longer wheelbase (109.3 in vs 112.2 in)
- Curb weight: Lincoln MKZ is 349 lb heavier (3,448 lb vs 3,797 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: Lincoln MKZ is 349 lb heavier (3,448 lb vs 3,797 lb)
- Length: Cadillac ATS is 11.3 in shorter (182.8 in vs 194.1 in)
- Height: Lincoln MKZ is 2.0 in taller (56.1 in vs 58.2 in)
- Width: Cadillac ATS is 2.3 in narrower (71.1 in vs 73.4 in)
- Wheelbase: Lincoln MKZ has a 2.9 in longer wheelbase (109.3 in vs 112.2 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageCadillac ATS — Cadillac ATS is shorter by 11.3 in Check garage fit for Cadillac ATS · garage fit for Lincoln MKZ
- Narrower for tight parkingCadillac ATS — Cadillac ATS is narrower by 2.3 in
- Smaller exterior footprintCadillac ATS — Based on length × width (Cadillac ATS)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Cadillac ATS | Lincoln MKZ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 182.8 in | 194.1 in | 11.3 in |
| Width | 71.1 in | 73.4 in | 2.3 in |
| Height | 56.1 in | 58.2 in | 2.0 in |
| Wheelbase | 109.3 in | 112.2 in | 2.9 in |
| Curb weight | 3,448 lb | 3,797 lb | 349 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.