Cadillac CTS-V vs Lincoln MKZ Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2013 catalog dimensions. Cadillac CTS-V · Lincoln MKZ
- Length188.5 in – 191.6 in
- Height56.0 in – 59.1 in
- Wheelbase113.4 in
- Curb weight4,217 lb – 4,396 lb
- Width72.5 in – 74.1 in
- Lincoln MKZ width73.4 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Cadillac CTS-V is 4.0 in shorter (190.1 in vs 194.1 in)
- Width: Cadillac CTS-V is 0.1 in narrower (73.3 in vs 73.4 in)
- Height: Lincoln MKZ is 0.6 in taller (57.5 in vs 58.2 in)
- Wheelbase: Cadillac CTS-V has a 1.2 in longer wheelbase (113.4 in vs 112.2 in)
- Curb weight: Cadillac CTS-V is 510 lb heavier (4,307 lb vs 3,797 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: Cadillac CTS-V is 510 lb heavier (4,307 lb vs 3,797 lb)
- Length: Cadillac CTS-V is 4.0 in shorter (190.1 in vs 194.1 in)
- Wheelbase: Cadillac CTS-V has a 1.2 in longer wheelbase (113.4 in vs 112.2 in)
- Height: Lincoln MKZ is 0.6 in taller (57.5 in vs 58.2 in)
- Width: Cadillac CTS-V is 0.1 in narrower (73.3 in vs 73.4 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageCadillac CTS-V — Cadillac CTS-V is shorter by 4.0 in Check garage fit for Cadillac CTS-V · garage fit for Lincoln MKZ
- Narrower for tight parkingCadillac CTS-V — Cadillac CTS-V is narrower by 0.1 in
- Smaller exterior footprintCadillac CTS-V — Based on length × width (Cadillac CTS-V)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Cadillac CTS-V | Lincoln MKZ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 190.1 in | 194.1 in | 4.0 in |
| Width | 73.3 in | 73.4 in | 0.1 in |
| Height | 57.5 in | 58.2 in | 0.6 in |
| Wheelbase | 113.4 in | 112.2 in | 1.2 in |
| Curb weight | 4,307 lb | 3,797 lb | 510 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range (e.g. length 188.5 in – 191.6 in).
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.