Cadillac CTS vs Kia Optima Dimensions & Size Comparison

Comparing 2004 catalog dimensions. Cadillac CTS · Kia Optima

Same scale for both vehicles. Generic silhouette — proportional to measured length, height, width, wheelbase, and clearance.

Side view
  • Length190.1 in
  • Height56.7 in
  • Wheelbase113.4 in
  • Curb weight3,509 lb
Front / width
  • Width70.6 in
  • Kia Optima width71.5 in

Which is bigger?

  • Length: Kia Optima is 4.3 in shorter (190.1 in vs 185.8 in)
  • Width: Cadillac CTS is 0.9 in narrower (70.6 in vs 71.5 in)
  • Height: Cadillac CTS is 1.2 in taller (56.7 in vs 55.5 in)
  • Wheelbase: Cadillac CTS has a 7.1 in longer wheelbase (113.4 in vs 106.3 in)
  • Curb weight: Cadillac CTS is 219 lb heavier (3,509 lb vs 3,290 lb)

Biggest size differences

  1. Wheelbase: Cadillac CTS has a 7.1 in longer wheelbase (113.4 in vs 106.3 in)
  2. Curb weight: Cadillac CTS is 219 lb heavier (3,509 lb vs 3,290 lb)
  3. Length: Kia Optima is 4.3 in shorter (190.1 in vs 185.8 in)
  4. Height: Cadillac CTS is 1.2 in taller (56.7 in vs 55.5 in)
  5. Width: Cadillac CTS is 0.9 in narrower (70.6 in vs 71.5 in)

Practical verdicts

  • Easier to fit in a short garageKia OptimaKia Optima is shorter by 4.3 in Check garage fit for Cadillac CTS · garage fit for Kia Optima
  • Narrower for tight parkingCadillac CTSCadillac CTS is narrower by 0.9 in
  • Smaller exterior footprintKia OptimaBased on length × width (Kia Optima)

Dimension comparison

SpecCadillac CTSKia OptimaDifference
Length190.1 in185.8 in4.3 in
Width70.6 in71.5 in0.9 in
Height56.7 in55.5 in1.2 in
Wheelbase113.4 in106.3 in7.1 in
Curb weight3,509 lb3,290 lb219 lb

Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.

Compare by year

Overlapping model years with dimension data.

Already own one of these cars?

Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.