Cadillac CTS vs Kia Optima Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2009 catalog dimensions. Cadillac CTS · Kia Optima
- Length191.6 in
- Height58.0 in
- Wheelbase113.4 in
- Curb weight3,861 lb – 3,874 lb
- Width72.5 in
- Kia Optima width71.1 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Kia Optima is 2.6 in shorter (191.6 in vs 189.0 in)
- Width: Kia Optima is 1.4 in narrower (72.5 in vs 71.1 in)
- Height: Kia Optima is 0.3 in taller (58.0 in vs 58.3 in)
- Wheelbase: Cadillac CTS has a 6.3 in longer wheelbase (113.4 in vs 107.1 in)
- Curb weight: Cadillac CTS is 642 lb heavier (3,868 lb vs 3,226 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: Cadillac CTS is 642 lb heavier (3,868 lb vs 3,226 lb)
- Wheelbase: Cadillac CTS has a 6.3 in longer wheelbase (113.4 in vs 107.1 in)
- Width: Kia Optima is 1.4 in narrower (72.5 in vs 71.1 in)
- Length: Kia Optima is 2.6 in shorter (191.6 in vs 189.0 in)
- Height: Kia Optima is 0.3 in taller (58.0 in vs 58.3 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageKia Optima — Kia Optima is shorter by 2.6 in Check garage fit for Cadillac CTS · garage fit for Kia Optima
- Narrower for tight parkingKia Optima — Kia Optima is narrower by 1.4 in
- Smaller exterior footprintKia Optima — Based on length × width (Kia Optima)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Cadillac CTS | Kia Optima | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 191.6 in | 189.0 in | 2.6 in |
| Width | 72.5 in | 71.1 in | 1.4 in |
| Height | 58.0 in | 58.3 in | 0.3 in |
| Wheelbase | 113.4 in | 107.1 in | 6.3 in |
| Curb weight | 3,868 lb | 3,226 lb | 642 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.