Cadillac CTS vs Kia Optima Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2013 vs 2020 catalog dimensions. Cadillac CTS · Kia Optima
- Length188.5 in – 192.0 in
- Height56.0 in – 58.0 in
- Wheelbase113.4 in
- Curb weight3,860 lb – 4,306 lb
- Width72.5 in – 74.1 in
- Kia Optima width73.2 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Cadillac CTS is 0.8 in shorter (190.3 in vs 191.1 in)
- Width: Kia Optima is 0.1 in narrower (73.3 in vs 73.2 in)
- Height: Kia Optima is 0.7 in taller (57.0 in vs 57.7 in)
- Wheelbase: Cadillac CTS has a 3.0 in longer wheelbase (113.4 in vs 110.4 in)
- Curb weight: Cadillac CTS is 689 lb heavier (4,083 lb vs 3,394 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: Cadillac CTS is 689 lb heavier (4,083 lb vs 3,394 lb)
- Wheelbase: Cadillac CTS has a 3.0 in longer wheelbase (113.4 in vs 110.4 in)
- Height: Kia Optima is 0.7 in taller (57.0 in vs 57.7 in)
- Length: Cadillac CTS is 0.8 in shorter (190.3 in vs 191.1 in)
- Width: Kia Optima is 0.1 in narrower (73.3 in vs 73.2 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageCadillac CTS — Cadillac CTS is shorter by 0.8 in Check garage fit for Cadillac CTS · garage fit for Kia Optima
- Narrower for tight parkingKia Optima — Kia Optima is narrower by 0.1 in
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Cadillac CTS | Kia Optima | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 190.3 in | 191.1 in | 0.8 in |
| Width | 73.3 in | 73.2 in | 0.1 in |
| Height | 57.0 in | 57.7 in | 0.7 in |
| Wheelbase | 113.4 in | 110.4 in | 3.0 in |
| Ground clearance | — | 5.3 in | — |
| Curb weight | 4,083 lb | 3,394 lb | 689 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range (e.g. length 188.5 in – 192.0 in).
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.