Cadillac CTS vs Kia Optima Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2014 catalog dimensions. Cadillac CTS · Kia Optima
- Length188.5 in – 195.5 in
- Height56.0 in – 58.0 in
- Wheelbase113.4 in – 114.6 in
- Curb weight3,616 lb – 4,316 lb
- Width72.2 in – 74.1 in
- Kia Optima width72.1 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Kia Optima is 1.3 in shorter (192.0 in vs 190.7 in)
- Width: Kia Optima is 1.1 in narrower (73.2 in vs 72.1 in)
- Height: Kia Optima is 0.1 in taller (57.0 in vs 57.1 in)
- Wheelbase: Cadillac CTS has a 4.0 in longer wheelbase (114.0 in vs 110.0 in)
- Curb weight: Cadillac CTS is 614 lb heavier (3,966 lb vs 3,353 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: Cadillac CTS is 614 lb heavier (3,966 lb vs 3,353 lb)
- Wheelbase: Cadillac CTS has a 4.0 in longer wheelbase (114.0 in vs 110.0 in)
- Width: Kia Optima is 1.1 in narrower (73.2 in vs 72.1 in)
- Length: Kia Optima is 1.3 in shorter (192.0 in vs 190.7 in)
- Height: Kia Optima is 0.1 in taller (57.0 in vs 57.1 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageKia Optima — Kia Optima is shorter by 1.3 in Check garage fit for Cadillac CTS · garage fit for Kia Optima
- Narrower for tight parkingKia Optima — Kia Optima is narrower by 1.1 in
- Smaller exterior footprintKia Optima — Based on length × width (Kia Optima)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Cadillac CTS | Kia Optima | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 192.0 in | 190.7 in | 1.3 in |
| Width | 73.2 in | 72.1 in | 1.1 in |
| Height | 57.0 in | 57.1 in | 0.1 in |
| Wheelbase | 114.0 in | 110.0 in | 4.0 in |
| Curb weight | 3,966 lb | 3,353 lb | 614 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range (e.g. length 188.5 in – 195.5 in).
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.