Chrysler Voyager vs Mitsubishi Outlander Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2003 catalog dimensions. Chrysler Voyager · Mitsubishi Outlander
- Length189.1 in
- Height68.9 in
- Wheelbase113.3 in
- Curb weight3,886 lb – 3,989 lb
- Width78.6 in
- Mitsubishi Outlander width68.9 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Mitsubishi Outlander is 10.0 in shorter (189.1 in vs 179.1 in)
- Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 9.7 in narrower (78.6 in vs 68.9 in)
- Height: Chrysler Voyager is 4.1 in taller (68.9 in vs 64.8 in)
- Wheelbase: Chrysler Voyager has a 10.0 in longer wheelbase (113.3 in vs 103.3 in)
- Curb weight: Chrysler Voyager is 587 lb heavier (3,938 lb vs 3,351 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: Chrysler Voyager is 587 lb heavier (3,938 lb vs 3,351 lb)
- Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 9.7 in narrower (78.6 in vs 68.9 in)
- Wheelbase: Chrysler Voyager has a 10.0 in longer wheelbase (113.3 in vs 103.3 in)
- Height: Chrysler Voyager is 4.1 in taller (68.9 in vs 64.8 in)
- Length: Mitsubishi Outlander is 10.0 in shorter (189.1 in vs 179.1 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageMitsubishi Outlander — Mitsubishi Outlander is shorter by 10.0 in Check garage fit for Chrysler Voyager · garage fit for Mitsubishi Outlander
- Narrower for tight parkingMitsubishi Outlander — Mitsubishi Outlander is narrower by 9.7 in
- Smaller exterior footprintMitsubishi Outlander — Based on length × width (Mitsubishi Outlander)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Chrysler Voyager | Mitsubishi Outlander | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 189.1 in | 179.1 in | 10.0 in |
| Width | 78.6 in | 68.9 in | 9.7 in |
| Height | 68.9 in | 64.8 in | 4.1 in |
| Wheelbase | 113.3 in | 103.3 in | 10.0 in |
| Curb weight | 3,938 lb | 3,351 lb | 587 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.