Ford Expedition vs Nissan Armada Dimensions & Size Comparison

Comparing 2013 catalog dimensions. Ford Expedition · Nissan Armada

Same scale for both vehicles. Generic silhouette — proportional to measured length, height, width, wheelbase, and clearance.

Side view
  • Length206.5 in
  • Height77.2 in
  • Wheelbase119.0 in
  • Curb weight5,549 lb – 5,781 lb
Front / width
  • Width78.8 in
  • Nissan Armada width79.3 in

Which is bigger?

  • Length: Ford Expedition is 1.2 in shorter (206.5 in vs 207.7 in)
  • Width: Ford Expedition is 0.5 in narrower (78.8 in vs 79.3 in)
  • Height: Nissan Armada is 0.4 in taller (77.2 in vs 77.6 in)
  • Wheelbase: Nissan Armada has a 4.2 in longer wheelbase (119.0 in vs 123.2 in)
  • Curb weight: Ford Expedition is 59 lb heavier (5,665 lb vs 5,607 lb)

Biggest size differences

  1. Wheelbase: Nissan Armada has a 4.2 in longer wheelbase (119.0 in vs 123.2 in)
  2. Curb weight: Ford Expedition is 59 lb heavier (5,665 lb vs 5,607 lb)
  3. Width: Ford Expedition is 0.5 in narrower (78.8 in vs 79.3 in)
  4. Length: Ford Expedition is 1.2 in shorter (206.5 in vs 207.7 in)
  5. Height: Nissan Armada is 0.4 in taller (77.2 in vs 77.6 in)

Practical verdicts

  • Easier to fit in a short garageFord ExpeditionFord Expedition is shorter by 1.2 in Check garage fit for Ford Expedition · garage fit for Nissan Armada
  • Narrower for tight parkingFord ExpeditionFord Expedition is narrower by 0.5 in
  • Smaller exterior footprintFord ExpeditionBased on length × width (Ford Expedition)

Dimension comparison

SpecFord ExpeditionNissan ArmadaDifference
Length206.5 in207.7 in1.2 in
Width78.8 in79.3 in0.5 in
Height77.2 in77.6 in0.4 in
Wheelbase119.0 in123.2 in4.2 in
Curb weight5,665 lb5,607 lb59 lb

Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.

Compare by year

Overlapping model years with dimension data.

Already own one of these cars?

Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.