Ford Expedition vs Toyota 4Runner Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2003 catalog dimensions. Ford Expedition · Toyota 4Runner
- Length205.8 in
- Height77.6 in
- Wheelbase119.0 in
- Curb weight5,267 lb – 5,686 lb
- Width78.7 in
- Toyota 4Runner width73.8 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Toyota 4Runner is 16.8 in shorter (205.8 in vs 189.0 in)
- Width: Toyota 4Runner is 4.9 in narrower (78.7 in vs 73.8 in)
- Height: Ford Expedition is 7.3 in taller (77.6 in vs 70.3 in)
- Wheelbase: Ford Expedition has a 9.2 in longer wheelbase (119.0 in vs 109.8 in)
- Curb weight: Ford Expedition is 1,239 lb heavier (5,477 lb vs 4,238 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: Ford Expedition is 1,239 lb heavier (5,477 lb vs 4,238 lb)
- Height: Ford Expedition is 7.3 in taller (77.6 in vs 70.3 in)
- Length: Toyota 4Runner is 16.8 in shorter (205.8 in vs 189.0 in)
- Wheelbase: Ford Expedition has a 9.2 in longer wheelbase (119.0 in vs 109.8 in)
- Width: Toyota 4Runner is 4.9 in narrower (78.7 in vs 73.8 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageToyota 4Runner — Toyota 4Runner is shorter by 16.8 in Check garage fit for Ford Expedition · garage fit for Toyota 4Runner
- Narrower for tight parkingToyota 4Runner — Toyota 4Runner is narrower by 4.9 in
- Smaller exterior footprintToyota 4Runner — Based on length × width (Toyota 4Runner)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Ford Expedition | Toyota 4Runner | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 205.8 in | 189.0 in | 16.8 in |
| Width | 78.7 in | 73.8 in | 4.9 in |
| Height | 77.6 in | 70.3 in | 7.3 in |
| Wheelbase | 119.0 in | 109.8 in | 9.2 in |
| Curb weight | 5,477 lb | 4,238 lb | 1,239 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.