Ford Explorer vs Mitsubishi Outlander Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2010 catalog dimensions. Ford Explorer · Mitsubishi Outlander
- Length193.4 in
- Height71.9 in
- Wheelbase113.7 in
- Curb weight4,460 lb – 4,632 lb
- Width73.7 in
- Mitsubishi Outlander width70.9 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Mitsubishi Outlander is 9.7 in shorter (193.4 in vs 183.7 in)
- Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 2.8 in narrower (73.7 in vs 70.9 in)
- Height: Ford Explorer is 5.8 in taller (71.9 in vs 66.1 in)
- Wheelbase: Ford Explorer has a 8.6 in longer wheelbase (113.7 in vs 105.1 in)
- Curb weight: Ford Explorer is 964 lb heavier (4,546 lb vs 3,582 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: Ford Explorer is 964 lb heavier (4,546 lb vs 3,582 lb)
- Height: Ford Explorer is 5.8 in taller (71.9 in vs 66.1 in)
- Wheelbase: Ford Explorer has a 8.6 in longer wheelbase (113.7 in vs 105.1 in)
- Length: Mitsubishi Outlander is 9.7 in shorter (193.4 in vs 183.7 in)
- Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 2.8 in narrower (73.7 in vs 70.9 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageMitsubishi Outlander — Mitsubishi Outlander is shorter by 9.7 in Check garage fit for Ford Explorer · garage fit for Mitsubishi Outlander
- Narrower for tight parkingMitsubishi Outlander — Mitsubishi Outlander is narrower by 2.8 in
- Smaller exterior footprintMitsubishi Outlander — Based on length × width (Mitsubishi Outlander)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Ford Explorer | Mitsubishi Outlander | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 193.4 in | 183.7 in | 9.7 in |
| Width | 73.7 in | 70.9 in | 2.8 in |
| Height | 71.9 in | 66.1 in | 5.8 in |
| Wheelbase | 113.7 in | 105.1 in | 8.6 in |
| Curb weight | 4,546 lb | 3,582 lb | 964 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.