Ford Flex vs Mitsubishi Outlander Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2013 catalog dimensions. Ford Flex · Mitsubishi Outlander
- Length201.8 in
- Height68.0 in
- Wheelbase117.9 in
- Curb weight4,471 lb – 4,839 lb
- Width75.9 in
- Mitsubishi Outlander width70.9 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Mitsubishi Outlander is 18.1 in shorter (201.8 in vs 183.7 in)
- Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 5.0 in narrower (75.9 in vs 70.9 in)
- Height: Ford Flex is 1.9 in taller (68.0 in vs 66.1 in)
- Wheelbase: Ford Flex has a 12.8 in longer wheelbase (117.9 in vs 105.1 in)
- Curb weight: Ford Flex is 1,073 lb heavier (4,655 lb vs 3,582 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: Ford Flex is 1,073 lb heavier (4,655 lb vs 3,582 lb)
- Wheelbase: Ford Flex has a 12.8 in longer wheelbase (117.9 in vs 105.1 in)
- Length: Mitsubishi Outlander is 18.1 in shorter (201.8 in vs 183.7 in)
- Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 5.0 in narrower (75.9 in vs 70.9 in)
- Height: Ford Flex is 1.9 in taller (68.0 in vs 66.1 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageMitsubishi Outlander — Mitsubishi Outlander is shorter by 18.1 in Check garage fit for Ford Flex · garage fit for Mitsubishi Outlander
- Narrower for tight parkingMitsubishi Outlander — Mitsubishi Outlander is narrower by 5.0 in
- Smaller exterior footprintMitsubishi Outlander — Based on length × width (Mitsubishi Outlander)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Ford Flex | Mitsubishi Outlander | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 201.8 in | 183.7 in | 18.1 in |
| Width | 75.9 in | 70.9 in | 5.0 in |
| Height | 68.0 in | 66.1 in | 1.9 in |
| Wheelbase | 117.9 in | 105.1 in | 12.8 in |
| Ground clearance | — | 9.0 in | — |
| Curb weight | 4,655 lb | 3,582 lb | 1,073 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.