Ford Ranger vs GMC Yukon Denali Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2000 catalog dimensions. Ford Ranger · GMC Yukon Denali
- Length187.5 in – 202.9 in
- Height63.9 in – 67.6 in
- Wheelbase111.6 in – 125.7 in
- Curb weight3,030 lb – 4,750 lb
- Width69.4 in
- GMC Yukon Denali width78.8 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Ford Ranger is 6.2 in shorter (195.2 in vs 201.4 in)
- Width: Ford Ranger is 9.4 in narrower (69.4 in vs 78.8 in)
- Height: GMC Yukon Denali is 8.5 in taller (65.8 in vs 74.3 in)
- Wheelbase: Ford Ranger has a 1.2 in longer wheelbase (118.7 in vs 117.5 in)
- Curb weight: GMC Yukon Denali is 1,977 lb heavier (3,890 lb vs 5,867 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: GMC Yukon Denali is 1,977 lb heavier (3,890 lb vs 5,867 lb)
- Width: Ford Ranger is 9.4 in narrower (69.4 in vs 78.8 in)
- Height: GMC Yukon Denali is 8.5 in taller (65.8 in vs 74.3 in)
- Length: Ford Ranger is 6.2 in shorter (195.2 in vs 201.4 in)
- Wheelbase: Ford Ranger has a 1.2 in longer wheelbase (118.7 in vs 117.5 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageFord Ranger — Ford Ranger is shorter by 6.2 in Check garage fit for Ford Ranger · garage fit for GMC Yukon Denali
- Narrower for tight parkingFord Ranger — Ford Ranger is narrower by 9.4 in
- Smaller exterior footprintFord Ranger — Based on length × width (Ford Ranger)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Ford Ranger | GMC Yukon Denali | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 195.2 in | 201.4 in | 6.2 in |
| Width | 69.4 in | 78.8 in | 9.4 in |
| Height | 65.8 in | 74.3 in | 8.5 in |
| Wheelbase | 118.7 in | 117.5 in | 1.2 in |
| Curb weight | 3,890 lb | 5,867 lb | 1,977 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range (e.g. length 187.5 in – 202.9 in).
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.