Spec Sizes

Ford Ranger vs GMC Yukon Dimensions & Size Comparison

Comparing 2001 catalog dimensions. Ford Ranger · GMC Yukon

Same scale for both vehicles. Generic silhouette — proportional to measured length, height, width, wheelbase, and clearance.

Side view
  • Length187.5 in – 202.9 in
  • Height64.8 in – 67.6 in
  • Wheelbase111.6 in – 125.7 in
  • Curb weight3,030 lb – 3,606 lb
Front / width
  • Width69.4 in
  • GMC Yukon width78.8 in

Which is bigger?

  • Length: Ford Ranger is 3.6 in shorter (195.2 in vs 198.8 in)
  • Width: Ford Ranger is 9.4 in narrower (69.4 in vs 78.8 in)
  • Height: GMC Yukon is 10.4 in taller (66.2 in vs 76.6 in)
  • Wheelbase: Ford Ranger has a 2.7 in longer wheelbase (118.7 in vs 116.0 in)
  • Curb weight: GMC Yukon is 1,834 lb heavier (3,318 lb vs 5,152 lb)

Biggest size differences

  1. Curb weight: GMC Yukon is 1,834 lb heavier (3,318 lb vs 5,152 lb)
  2. Height: GMC Yukon is 10.4 in taller (66.2 in vs 76.6 in)
  3. Width: Ford Ranger is 9.4 in narrower (69.4 in vs 78.8 in)
  4. Wheelbase: Ford Ranger has a 2.7 in longer wheelbase (118.7 in vs 116.0 in)
  5. Length: Ford Ranger is 3.6 in shorter (195.2 in vs 198.8 in)

Practical verdicts

  • Easier to fit in a short garageFord Ranger — Ford Ranger is shorter by 3.6 in Check garage fit for Ford Ranger · garage fit for GMC Yukon
  • Narrower for tight parkingFord Ranger — Ford Ranger is narrower by 9.4 in
  • Smaller exterior footprintFord Ranger — Based on length × width (Ford Ranger)

Dimension comparison

SpecFord RangerGMC YukonDifference
Length195.2 in198.8 in3.6 in
Width69.4 in78.8 in9.4 in
Height66.2 in76.6 in10.4 in
Wheelbase118.7 in116.0 in2.7 in
Ground clearance—9.8 in—
Curb weight3,318 lb5,152 lb1,834 lb

Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range (e.g. length 187.5 in – 202.9 in).

Compare by year

Overlapping model years with dimension data.

Already own one of these cars?

Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.