Ford Ranger vs GMC Yukon Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2010 catalog dimensions. Ford Ranger · GMC Yukon
- Length189.4 in – 203.6 in
- Height66.2 in – 67.7 in
- Wheelbase111.5 in – 125.9 in
- Curb weight3,028 lb – 3,606 lb
- Width69.3 in – 71.3 in
- GMC Yukon width79.0 in – 79.1 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Ford Ranger is 5.5 in shorter (196.5 in vs 202.0 in)
- Width: Ford Ranger is 8.8 in narrower (70.3 in vs 79.0 in)
- Height: GMC Yukon is 10.0 in taller (67.0 in vs 76.9 in)
- Wheelbase: Ford Ranger has a 2.7 in longer wheelbase (118.7 in vs 116.0 in)
- Curb weight: GMC Yukon is 2,341 lb heavier (3,317 lb vs 5,658 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: GMC Yukon is 2,341 lb heavier (3,317 lb vs 5,658 lb)
- Height: GMC Yukon is 10.0 in taller (67.0 in vs 76.9 in)
- Width: Ford Ranger is 8.8 in narrower (70.3 in vs 79.0 in)
- Length: Ford Ranger is 5.5 in shorter (196.5 in vs 202.0 in)
- Wheelbase: Ford Ranger has a 2.7 in longer wheelbase (118.7 in vs 116.0 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageFord Ranger — Ford Ranger is shorter by 5.5 in Check garage fit for Ford Ranger · garage fit for GMC Yukon
- Narrower for tight parkingFord Ranger — Ford Ranger is narrower by 8.8 in
- Smaller exterior footprintFord Ranger — Based on length × width (Ford Ranger)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Ford Ranger | GMC Yukon | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 196.5 in | 202.0 in | 5.5 in |
| Width | 70.3 in | 79.0 in | 8.8 in |
| Height | 67.0 in | 76.9 in | 10.0 in |
| Wheelbase | 118.7 in | 116.0 in | 2.7 in |
| Curb weight | 3,317 lb | 5,658 lb | 2,341 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range (e.g. length 189.4 in – 203.6 in).
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.