Ford Ranger vs Volvo XC60 Dimensions & Size Comparison

Comparing 2010 catalog dimensions. Ford Ranger · Volvo XC60

Same scale for both vehicles. Generic silhouette — proportional to measured length, height, width, wheelbase, and clearance.

Side view
  • Length189.4 in – 203.6 in
  • Height66.2 in – 67.7 in
  • Wheelbase111.5 in – 125.9 in
  • Curb weight3,028 lb – 3,606 lb
Front / width
  • Width69.3 in – 71.3 in
  • Volvo XC60 width74.4 in

Which is bigger?

  • Length: Volvo XC60 is 14.3 in shorter (196.5 in vs 182.2 in)
  • Width: Ford Ranger is 4.1 in narrower (70.3 in vs 74.4 in)
  • Height: Volvo XC60 is 0.5 in taller (67.0 in vs 67.4 in)
  • Wheelbase: Ford Ranger has a 9.5 in longer wheelbase (118.7 in vs 109.2 in)
  • Curb weight: Volvo XC60 is 776 lb heavier (3,317 lb vs 4,093 lb)

Biggest size differences

  1. Curb weight: Volvo XC60 is 776 lb heavier (3,317 lb vs 4,093 lb)
  2. Wheelbase: Ford Ranger has a 9.5 in longer wheelbase (118.7 in vs 109.2 in)
  3. Length: Volvo XC60 is 14.3 in shorter (196.5 in vs 182.2 in)
  4. Width: Ford Ranger is 4.1 in narrower (70.3 in vs 74.4 in)
  5. Height: Volvo XC60 is 0.5 in taller (67.0 in vs 67.4 in)

Practical verdicts

  • Easier to fit in a short garageVolvo XC60 — Volvo XC60 is shorter by 14.3 in Check garage fit for Ford Ranger · garage fit for Volvo XC60
  • Narrower for tight parkingFord Ranger — Ford Ranger is narrower by 4.1 in
  • Smaller exterior footprintVolvo XC60 — Based on length × width (Volvo XC60)

Dimension comparison

SpecFord RangerVolvo XC60Difference
Length196.5 in182.2 in14.3 in
Width70.3 in74.4 in4.1 in
Height67.0 in67.4 in0.5 in
Wheelbase118.7 in109.2 in9.5 in
Curb weight3,317 lb4,093 lb776 lb

Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range (e.g. length 189.4 in – 203.6 in).

Compare by year

Overlapping model years with dimension data.

Already own one of these cars?

Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.