Ford Ranger vs Volvo XC90 Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2007 catalog dimensions. Ford Ranger · Volvo XC90
- Length188.5 in – 202.9 in
- Height66.2 in – 69.4 in
- Wheelbase111.6 in – 125.7 in
- Curb weight3,028 lb – 3,606 lb
- Width69.4 in – 70.3 in
- Volvo XC90 width74.7 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Volvo XC90 is 6.4 in shorter (195.7 in vs 189.3 in)
- Width: Ford Ranger is 4.9 in narrower (69.8 in vs 74.7 in)
- Height: Volvo XC90 is 2.4 in taller (67.8 in vs 70.2 in)
- Wheelbase: Ford Ranger has a 6.1 in longer wheelbase (118.7 in vs 112.6 in)
- Curb weight: Volvo XC90 is 1,321 lb heavier (3,317 lb vs 4,638 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: Volvo XC90 is 1,321 lb heavier (3,317 lb vs 4,638 lb)
- Width: Ford Ranger is 4.9 in narrower (69.8 in vs 74.7 in)
- Wheelbase: Ford Ranger has a 6.1 in longer wheelbase (118.7 in vs 112.6 in)
- Height: Volvo XC90 is 2.4 in taller (67.8 in vs 70.2 in)
- Length: Volvo XC90 is 6.4 in shorter (195.7 in vs 189.3 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageVolvo XC90 — Volvo XC90 is shorter by 6.4 in Check garage fit for Ford Ranger · garage fit for Volvo XC90
- Narrower for tight parkingFord Ranger — Ford Ranger is narrower by 4.9 in
- Smaller exterior footprintFord Ranger — Based on length × width (Ford Ranger)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Ford Ranger | Volvo XC90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 195.7 in | 189.3 in | 6.4 in |
| Width | 69.8 in | 74.7 in | 4.9 in |
| Height | 67.8 in | 70.2 in | 2.4 in |
| Wheelbase | 118.7 in | 112.6 in | 6.1 in |
| Curb weight | 3,317 lb | 4,638 lb | 1,321 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range (e.g. length 188.5 in – 202.9 in).
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.