Spec Sizes

Ford Ranger vs Volvo XC90 Dimensions & Size Comparison

Comparing 2010 catalog dimensions. Ford Ranger · Volvo XC90

Same scale for both vehicles. Generic silhouette — proportional to measured length, height, width, wheelbase, and clearance.

Side view
  • Length189.4 in – 203.6 in
  • Height66.2 in – 67.7 in
  • Wheelbase111.5 in – 125.9 in
  • Curb weight3,028 lb – 3,606 lb
Front / width
  • Width69.3 in – 71.3 in
  • Volvo XC90 width74.7 in

Which is bigger?

  • Length: Volvo XC90 is 7.2 in shorter (196.5 in vs 189.3 in)
  • Width: Ford Ranger is 4.4 in narrower (70.3 in vs 74.7 in)
  • Height: Volvo XC90 is 3.3 in taller (67.0 in vs 70.2 in)
  • Wheelbase: Ford Ranger has a 6.1 in longer wheelbase (118.7 in vs 112.6 in)
  • Curb weight: Volvo XC90 is 1,477 lb heavier (3,317 lb vs 4,794 lb)

Biggest size differences

  1. Curb weight: Volvo XC90 is 1,477 lb heavier (3,317 lb vs 4,794 lb)
  2. Width: Ford Ranger is 4.4 in narrower (70.3 in vs 74.7 in)
  3. Wheelbase: Ford Ranger has a 6.1 in longer wheelbase (118.7 in vs 112.6 in)
  4. Height: Volvo XC90 is 3.3 in taller (67.0 in vs 70.2 in)
  5. Length: Volvo XC90 is 7.2 in shorter (196.5 in vs 189.3 in)

Practical verdicts

  • Easier to fit in a short garageVolvo XC90 — Volvo XC90 is shorter by 7.2 in Check garage fit for Ford Ranger · garage fit for Volvo XC90
  • Narrower for tight parkingFord Ranger — Ford Ranger is narrower by 4.4 in
  • Smaller exterior footprintFord Ranger — Based on length × width (Ford Ranger)

Dimension comparison

SpecFord RangerVolvo XC90Difference
Length196.5 in189.3 in7.2 in
Width70.3 in74.7 in4.4 in
Height67.0 in70.2 in3.3 in
Wheelbase118.7 in112.6 in6.1 in
Curb weight3,317 lb4,794 lb1,477 lb

Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range (e.g. length 189.4 in – 203.6 in).

Compare by year

Overlapping model years with dimension data.

Already own one of these cars?

Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.