GMC Yukon vs Ford Ranger Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2008 catalog dimensions. GMC Yukon · Ford Ranger
- Length202.0 in
- Height76.9 in – 77.0 in
- Wheelbase116.0 in
- Curb weight5,270 lb – 5,635 lb
- Width79.0 in
- Ford Ranger width69.4 in – 70.3 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Ford Ranger is 6.3 in shorter (202.0 in vs 195.7 in)
- Width: Ford Ranger is 9.2 in narrower (79.0 in vs 69.8 in)
- Height: GMC Yukon is 9.1 in taller (77.0 in vs 67.8 in)
- Wheelbase: Ford Ranger has a 2.7 in longer wheelbase (116.0 in vs 118.7 in)
- Curb weight: GMC Yukon is 2,136 lb heavier (5,453 lb vs 3,317 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: GMC Yukon is 2,136 lb heavier (5,453 lb vs 3,317 lb)
- Height: GMC Yukon is 9.1 in taller (77.0 in vs 67.8 in)
- Width: Ford Ranger is 9.2 in narrower (79.0 in vs 69.8 in)
- Length: Ford Ranger is 6.3 in shorter (202.0 in vs 195.7 in)
- Wheelbase: Ford Ranger has a 2.7 in longer wheelbase (116.0 in vs 118.7 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageFord Ranger — Ford Ranger is shorter by 6.3 in Check garage fit for GMC Yukon · garage fit for Ford Ranger
- Narrower for tight parkingFord Ranger — Ford Ranger is narrower by 9.2 in
- Smaller exterior footprintFord Ranger — Based on length × width (Ford Ranger)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | GMC Yukon | Ford Ranger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 202.0 in | 195.7 in | 6.3 in |
| Width | 79.0 in | 69.8 in | 9.2 in |
| Height | 77.0 in | 67.8 in | 9.1 in |
| Wheelbase | 116.0 in | 118.7 in | 2.7 in |
| Curb weight | 5,453 lb | 3,317 lb | 2,136 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.