GMC Yukon vs Ford Ranger Dimensions & Size Comparison

Comparing 2008 catalog dimensions. GMC Yukon · Ford Ranger

Same scale for both vehicles. Generic silhouette — proportional to measured length, height, width, wheelbase, and clearance.

Side view
  • Length202.0 in
  • Height76.9 in – 77.0 in
  • Wheelbase116.0 in
  • Curb weight5,270 lb – 5,635 lb
Front / width
  • Width79.0 in
  • Ford Ranger width69.4 in – 70.3 in

Which is bigger?

  • Length: Ford Ranger is 6.3 in shorter (202.0 in vs 195.7 in)
  • Width: Ford Ranger is 9.2 in narrower (79.0 in vs 69.8 in)
  • Height: GMC Yukon is 9.1 in taller (77.0 in vs 67.8 in)
  • Wheelbase: Ford Ranger has a 2.7 in longer wheelbase (116.0 in vs 118.7 in)
  • Curb weight: GMC Yukon is 2,136 lb heavier (5,453 lb vs 3,317 lb)

Biggest size differences

  1. Curb weight: GMC Yukon is 2,136 lb heavier (5,453 lb vs 3,317 lb)
  2. Height: GMC Yukon is 9.1 in taller (77.0 in vs 67.8 in)
  3. Width: Ford Ranger is 9.2 in narrower (79.0 in vs 69.8 in)
  4. Length: Ford Ranger is 6.3 in shorter (202.0 in vs 195.7 in)
  5. Wheelbase: Ford Ranger has a 2.7 in longer wheelbase (116.0 in vs 118.7 in)

Practical verdicts

  • Easier to fit in a short garageFord RangerFord Ranger is shorter by 6.3 in Check garage fit for GMC Yukon · garage fit for Ford Ranger
  • Narrower for tight parkingFord RangerFord Ranger is narrower by 9.2 in
  • Smaller exterior footprintFord RangerBased on length × width (Ford Ranger)

Dimension comparison

SpecGMC YukonFord RangerDifference
Length202.0 in195.7 in6.3 in
Width79.0 in69.8 in9.2 in
Height77.0 in67.8 in9.1 in
Wheelbase116.0 in118.7 in2.7 in
Curb weight5,453 lb3,317 lb2,136 lb

Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.

Compare by year

Overlapping model years with dimension data.

Already own one of these cars?

Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.