Spec Sizes

GMC Yukon vs Ford Ranger Dimensions & Size Comparison

Comparing 2010 catalog dimensions. GMC Yukon · Ford Ranger

Same scale for both vehicles. Generic silhouette — proportional to measured length, height, width, wheelbase, and clearance.

Side view
  • Length202.0 in
  • Height76.9 in
  • Wheelbase116.0 in
  • Curb weight5,584 lb – 5,732 lb
Front / width
  • Width79.0 in – 79.1 in
  • Ford Ranger width69.3 in – 71.3 in

Which is bigger?

  • Length: Ford Ranger is 5.5 in shorter (202.0 in vs 196.5 in)
  • Width: Ford Ranger is 8.8 in narrower (79.0 in vs 70.3 in)
  • Height: GMC Yukon is 10.0 in taller (76.9 in vs 67.0 in)
  • Wheelbase: Ford Ranger has a 2.7 in longer wheelbase (116.0 in vs 118.7 in)
  • Curb weight: GMC Yukon is 2,341 lb heavier (5,658 lb vs 3,317 lb)

Biggest size differences

  1. Curb weight: GMC Yukon is 2,341 lb heavier (5,658 lb vs 3,317 lb)
  2. Height: GMC Yukon is 10.0 in taller (76.9 in vs 67.0 in)
  3. Width: Ford Ranger is 8.8 in narrower (79.0 in vs 70.3 in)
  4. Length: Ford Ranger is 5.5 in shorter (202.0 in vs 196.5 in)
  5. Wheelbase: Ford Ranger has a 2.7 in longer wheelbase (116.0 in vs 118.7 in)

Practical verdicts

  • Easier to fit in a short garageFord Ranger — Ford Ranger is shorter by 5.5 in Check garage fit for GMC Yukon · garage fit for Ford Ranger
  • Narrower for tight parkingFord Ranger — Ford Ranger is narrower by 8.8 in
  • Smaller exterior footprintFord Ranger — Based on length × width (Ford Ranger)

Dimension comparison

SpecGMC YukonFord RangerDifference
Length202.0 in196.5 in5.5 in
Width79.0 in70.3 in8.8 in
Height76.9 in67.0 in10.0 in
Wheelbase116.0 in118.7 in2.7 in
Curb weight5,658 lb3,317 lb2,341 lb

Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.

Compare by year

Overlapping model years with dimension data.

Already own one of these cars?

Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.