Jeep Wrangler vs Mitsubishi Outlander Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2010 catalog dimensions. Jeep Wrangler · Mitsubishi Outlander
- Length163.8 in
- Height70.9 in – 72.4 in
- Wheelbase95.4 in
- Ground clearance9.1 in – 10.6 in
- Curb weight3,839 lb – 4,082 lb
- Width73.7 in
- Mitsubishi Outlander width70.9 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Jeep Wrangler is 19.9 in shorter (163.8 in vs 183.7 in)
- Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 2.8 in narrower (73.7 in vs 70.9 in)
- Height: Jeep Wrangler is 5.6 in taller (71.7 in vs 66.1 in)
- Wheelbase: Mitsubishi Outlander has a 9.7 in longer wheelbase (95.4 in vs 105.1 in)
- Curb weight: Jeep Wrangler is 379 lb heavier (3,961 lb vs 3,582 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Length: Jeep Wrangler is 19.9 in shorter (163.8 in vs 183.7 in)
- Curb weight: Jeep Wrangler is 379 lb heavier (3,961 lb vs 3,582 lb)
- Wheelbase: Mitsubishi Outlander has a 9.7 in longer wheelbase (95.4 in vs 105.1 in)
- Height: Jeep Wrangler is 5.6 in taller (71.7 in vs 66.1 in)
- Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 2.8 in narrower (73.7 in vs 70.9 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageJeep Wrangler — Jeep Wrangler is shorter by 19.9 in Check garage fit for Jeep Wrangler · garage fit for Mitsubishi Outlander
- Narrower for tight parkingMitsubishi Outlander — Mitsubishi Outlander is narrower by 2.8 in
- Smaller exterior footprintJeep Wrangler — Based on length × width (Jeep Wrangler)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Jeep Wrangler | Mitsubishi Outlander | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 163.8 in | 183.7 in | 19.9 in |
| Width | 73.7 in | 70.9 in | 2.8 in |
| Height | 71.7 in | 66.1 in | 5.6 in |
| Wheelbase | 95.4 in | 105.1 in | 9.7 in |
| Ground clearance | 9.8 in | — | — |
| Curb weight | 3,961 lb | 3,582 lb | 379 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.