Lincoln MKZ vs Cadillac ATS Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2014 catalog dimensions. Lincoln MKZ · Cadillac ATS
- Length194.1 in
- Height58.1 in – 58.2 in
- Wheelbase112.2 in
- Curb weight3,719 lb – 3,874 lb
- Width73.4 in
- Cadillac ATS width71.1 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Cadillac ATS is 11.3 in shorter (194.1 in vs 182.8 in)
- Width: Cadillac ATS is 2.3 in narrower (73.4 in vs 71.1 in)
- Height: Lincoln MKZ is 2.0 in taller (58.2 in vs 56.1 in)
- Wheelbase: Lincoln MKZ has a 2.9 in longer wheelbase (112.2 in vs 109.3 in)
- Curb weight: Lincoln MKZ is 323 lb heavier (3,797 lb vs 3,474 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: Lincoln MKZ is 323 lb heavier (3,797 lb vs 3,474 lb)
- Length: Cadillac ATS is 11.3 in shorter (194.1 in vs 182.8 in)
- Height: Lincoln MKZ is 2.0 in taller (58.2 in vs 56.1 in)
- Width: Cadillac ATS is 2.3 in narrower (73.4 in vs 71.1 in)
- Wheelbase: Lincoln MKZ has a 2.9 in longer wheelbase (112.2 in vs 109.3 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageCadillac ATS — Cadillac ATS is shorter by 11.3 in Check garage fit for Lincoln MKZ · garage fit for Cadillac ATS
- Narrower for tight parkingCadillac ATS — Cadillac ATS is narrower by 2.3 in
- Smaller exterior footprintCadillac ATS — Based on length × width (Cadillac ATS)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Lincoln MKZ | Cadillac ATS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 194.1 in | 182.8 in | 11.3 in |
| Width | 73.4 in | 71.1 in | 2.3 in |
| Height | 58.2 in | 56.1 in | 2.0 in |
| Wheelbase | 112.2 in | 109.3 in | 2.9 in |
| Curb weight | 3,797 lb | 3,474 lb | 323 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.