Lincoln MKZ vs Cadillac CTS Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2010 catalog dimensions. Lincoln MKZ · Cadillac CTS
- Length189.8 in
- Height56.9 in
- Wheelbase107.4 in
- Curb weight3,598 lb – 3,796 lb
- Width72.2 in
- Cadillac CTS width72.5 in – 72.6 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Lincoln MKZ is 1.8 in shorter (189.8 in vs 191.6 in)
- Width: Lincoln MKZ is 0.3 in narrower (72.2 in vs 72.5 in)
- Height: Cadillac CTS is 1.7 in taller (56.9 in vs 58.6 in)
- Wheelbase: Cadillac CTS has a 6.0 in longer wheelbase (107.4 in vs 113.4 in)
- Curb weight: Cadillac CTS is 171 lb heavier (3,697 lb vs 3,868 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Wheelbase: Cadillac CTS has a 6.0 in longer wheelbase (107.4 in vs 113.4 in)
- Curb weight: Cadillac CTS is 171 lb heavier (3,697 lb vs 3,868 lb)
- Height: Cadillac CTS is 1.7 in taller (56.9 in vs 58.6 in)
- Length: Lincoln MKZ is 1.8 in shorter (189.8 in vs 191.6 in)
- Width: Lincoln MKZ is 0.3 in narrower (72.2 in vs 72.5 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageLincoln MKZ — Lincoln MKZ is shorter by 1.8 in Check garage fit for Lincoln MKZ · garage fit for Cadillac CTS
- Narrower for tight parkingLincoln MKZ — Lincoln MKZ is narrower by 0.3 in
- Smaller exterior footprintLincoln MKZ — Based on length × width (Lincoln MKZ)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Lincoln MKZ | Cadillac CTS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 189.8 in | 191.6 in | 1.8 in |
| Width | 72.2 in | 72.5 in | 0.3 in |
| Height | 56.9 in | 58.6 in | 1.7 in |
| Wheelbase | 107.4 in | 113.4 in | 6.0 in |
| Curb weight | 3,697 lb | 3,868 lb | 171 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.