Lincoln MKZ vs Cadillac CTS Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2013 catalog dimensions. Lincoln MKZ · Cadillac CTS
- Length194.1 in
- Height58.1 in – 58.2 in
- Wheelbase112.2 in
- Curb weight3,719 lb – 3,874 lb
- Width73.4 in
- Cadillac CTS width72.5 in – 74.1 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Cadillac CTS is 3.8 in shorter (194.1 in vs 190.3 in)
- Width: Cadillac CTS is 0.1 in narrower (73.4 in vs 73.3 in)
- Height: Lincoln MKZ is 1.2 in taller (58.2 in vs 57.0 in)
- Wheelbase: Cadillac CTS has a 1.2 in longer wheelbase (112.2 in vs 113.4 in)
- Curb weight: Cadillac CTS is 287 lb heavier (3,797 lb vs 4,083 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: Cadillac CTS is 287 lb heavier (3,797 lb vs 4,083 lb)
- Length: Cadillac CTS is 3.8 in shorter (194.1 in vs 190.3 in)
- Height: Lincoln MKZ is 1.2 in taller (58.2 in vs 57.0 in)
- Wheelbase: Cadillac CTS has a 1.2 in longer wheelbase (112.2 in vs 113.4 in)
- Width: Cadillac CTS is 0.1 in narrower (73.4 in vs 73.3 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageCadillac CTS — Cadillac CTS is shorter by 3.8 in Check garage fit for Lincoln MKZ · garage fit for Cadillac CTS
- Narrower for tight parkingCadillac CTS — Cadillac CTS is narrower by 0.1 in
- Smaller exterior footprintCadillac CTS — Based on length × width (Cadillac CTS)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Lincoln MKZ | Cadillac CTS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 194.1 in | 190.3 in | 3.8 in |
| Width | 73.4 in | 73.3 in | 0.1 in |
| Height | 58.2 in | 57.0 in | 1.2 in |
| Wheelbase | 112.2 in | 113.4 in | 1.2 in |
| Curb weight | 3,797 lb | 4,083 lb | 287 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.