Mazda CX-9 vs Mitsubishi Outlander Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2009 catalog dimensions. Mazda CX-9 · Mitsubishi Outlander
- Length199.8 in
- Height68.0 in
- Wheelbase113.2 in
- Ground clearance8.0 in
- Curb weight4,334 lb – 4,550 lb
- Width76.2 in
- Mitsubishi Outlander width70.9 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Mitsubishi Outlander is 17.1 in shorter (199.8 in vs 182.7 in)
- Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 5.3 in narrower (76.2 in vs 70.9 in)
- Height: Mazda CX-9 is 0.3 in taller (68.0 in vs 67.7 in)
- Wheelbase: Mazda CX-9 has a 8.1 in longer wheelbase (113.2 in vs 105.1 in)
- Curb weight: Mazda CX-9 is 854 lb heavier (4,442 lb vs 3,588 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: Mazda CX-9 is 854 lb heavier (4,442 lb vs 3,588 lb)
- Length: Mitsubishi Outlander is 17.1 in shorter (199.8 in vs 182.7 in)
- Wheelbase: Mazda CX-9 has a 8.1 in longer wheelbase (113.2 in vs 105.1 in)
- Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 5.3 in narrower (76.2 in vs 70.9 in)
- Height: Mazda CX-9 is 0.3 in taller (68.0 in vs 67.7 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageMitsubishi Outlander — Mitsubishi Outlander is shorter by 17.1 in Check garage fit for Mazda CX-9 · garage fit for Mitsubishi Outlander
- Narrower for tight parkingMitsubishi Outlander — Mitsubishi Outlander is narrower by 5.3 in
- Smaller exterior footprintMitsubishi Outlander — Based on length × width (Mitsubishi Outlander)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Mazda CX-9 | Mitsubishi Outlander | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 199.8 in | 182.7 in | 17.1 in |
| Width | 76.2 in | 70.9 in | 5.3 in |
| Height | 68.0 in | 67.7 in | 0.3 in |
| Wheelbase | 113.2 in | 105.1 in | 8.1 in |
| Ground clearance | 8.0 in | — | — |
| Curb weight | 4,442 lb | 3,588 lb | 854 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.