Mazda CX-9 vs Mitsubishi Outlander Dimensions & Size Comparison

Comparing 2016 catalog dimensions. Mazda CX-9 · Mitsubishi Outlander

Same scale for both vehicles. Generic silhouette — proportional to measured length, height, width, wheelbase, and clearance.

Side view
  • Length199.4 in
  • Wheelbase115.3 in
  • Ground clearance8.7 in – 9.0 in
  • Curb weight4,301 lb – 4,504 lb
Front / width
  • Mitsubishi Outlander width71.3 in

Which is bigger?

  • Length: Mitsubishi Outlander is 14.6 in shorter (199.4 in vs 184.8 in)
  • Wheelbase: Mazda CX-9 has a 10.2 in longer wheelbase (115.3 in vs 105.1 in)
  • Ground clearance: Mazda CX-9 has 0.1 in more ground clearance (8.8 in vs 8.8 in)
  • Curb weight: Mazda CX-9 is 947 lb heavier (4,403 lb vs 3,456 lb)

Biggest size differences

  1. Curb weight: Mazda CX-9 is 947 lb heavier (4,403 lb vs 3,456 lb)
  2. Wheelbase: Mazda CX-9 has a 10.2 in longer wheelbase (115.3 in vs 105.1 in)
  3. Length: Mitsubishi Outlander is 14.6 in shorter (199.4 in vs 184.8 in)
  4. Ground clearance: Mazda CX-9 has 0.1 in more ground clearance (8.8 in vs 8.8 in)

Practical verdicts

  • Easier to fit in a short garageMitsubishi Outlander — Mitsubishi Outlander is shorter by 14.6 in
  • More ground clearanceMazda CX-9 — Mazda CX-9 has 0.1 in more clearance

Dimension comparison

SpecMazda CX-9Mitsubishi OutlanderDifference
Length199.4 in184.8 in14.6 in
Width—71.3 in—
Height—66.1 in—
Wheelbase115.3 in105.1 in10.2 in
Ground clearance8.8 in8.8 in0.1 in
Curb weight4,403 lb3,456 lb947 lb

Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.

Compare by year

Overlapping model years with dimension data.

Already own one of these cars?

Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.