Mazda CX-9 vs Volvo XC90 Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2008 catalog dimensions. Mazda CX-9 · Volvo XC90
- Length199.8 in
- Height68.0 in
- Wheelbase113.2 in
- Ground clearance8.0 in
- Curb weight4,312 lb – 4,528 lb
- Width76.2 in
- Volvo XC90 width74.7 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Volvo XC90 is 10.5 in shorter (199.8 in vs 189.3 in)
- Width: Volvo XC90 is 1.5 in narrower (76.2 in vs 74.7 in)
- Height: Volvo XC90 is 2.2 in taller (68.0 in vs 70.2 in)
- Wheelbase: Mazda CX-9 has a 0.6 in longer wheelbase (113.2 in vs 112.6 in)
- Curb weight: Volvo XC90 is 218 lb heavier (4,420 lb vs 4,638 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Length: Volvo XC90 is 10.5 in shorter (199.8 in vs 189.3 in)
- Curb weight: Volvo XC90 is 218 lb heavier (4,420 lb vs 4,638 lb)
- Height: Volvo XC90 is 2.2 in taller (68.0 in vs 70.2 in)
- Width: Volvo XC90 is 1.5 in narrower (76.2 in vs 74.7 in)
- Wheelbase: Mazda CX-9 has a 0.6 in longer wheelbase (113.2 in vs 112.6 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageVolvo XC90 — Volvo XC90 is shorter by 10.5 in Check garage fit for Mazda CX-9 · garage fit for Volvo XC90
- Narrower for tight parkingVolvo XC90 — Volvo XC90 is narrower by 1.5 in
- Smaller exterior footprintVolvo XC90 — Based on length × width (Volvo XC90)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Mazda CX-9 | Volvo XC90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 199.8 in | 189.3 in | 10.5 in |
| Width | 76.2 in | 74.7 in | 1.5 in |
| Height | 68.0 in | 70.2 in | 2.2 in |
| Wheelbase | 113.2 in | 112.6 in | 0.6 in |
| Ground clearance | 8.0 in | — | — |
| Curb weight | 4,420 lb | 4,638 lb | 218 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.