Mazda CX-9 vs Volvo XC90 Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2013 catalog dimensions. Mazda CX-9 · Volvo XC90
- Length200.2 in
- Height68.0 in
- Wheelbase113.2 in
- Ground clearance8.0 in
- Curb weight4,317 lb – 4,552 lb
- Width76.2 in
- Volvo XC90 width76.2 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Volvo XC90 is 10.9 in shorter (200.2 in vs 189.3 in)
- Width: essentially the same
- Height: Volvo XC90 is 2.2 in taller (68.0 in vs 70.2 in)
- Wheelbase: Mazda CX-9 has a 0.6 in longer wheelbase (113.2 in vs 112.6 in)
- Ground clearance: Volvo XC90 has 1.3 in more ground clearance (8.0 in vs 9.3 in)
- Curb weight: Volvo XC90 is 275 lb heavier (4,435 lb vs 4,709 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Ground clearance: Volvo XC90 has 1.3 in more ground clearance (8.0 in vs 9.3 in)
- Curb weight: Volvo XC90 is 275 lb heavier (4,435 lb vs 4,709 lb)
- Length: Volvo XC90 is 10.9 in shorter (200.2 in vs 189.3 in)
- Height: Volvo XC90 is 2.2 in taller (68.0 in vs 70.2 in)
- Wheelbase: Mazda CX-9 has a 0.6 in longer wheelbase (113.2 in vs 112.6 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageVolvo XC90 — Volvo XC90 is shorter by 10.9 in Check garage fit for Mazda CX-9 · garage fit for Volvo XC90
- More ground clearanceVolvo XC90 — Volvo XC90 has 1.3 in more clearance
- Smaller exterior footprintVolvo XC90 — Based on length × width (Volvo XC90)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Mazda CX-9 | Volvo XC90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 200.2 in | 189.3 in | 10.9 in |
| Width | 76.2 in | 76.2 in | 0.0 in |
| Height | 68.0 in | 70.2 in | 2.2 in |
| Wheelbase | 113.2 in | 112.6 in | 0.6 in |
| Ground clearance | 8.0 in | 9.3 in | 1.3 in |
| Curb weight | 4,435 lb | 4,709 lb | 275 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.