Mitsubishi Lancer vs Chevrolet Cobalt Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2013 vs 2010 catalog dimensions. Mitsubishi Lancer · Chevrolet Cobalt
- Length180.0 in
- Height58.3 in – 58.7 in
- Wheelbase103.7 in
- Curb weight2,866 lb – 3,461 lb
- Width69.4 in
- Chevrolet Cobalt width67.9 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Mitsubishi Lancer is 0.4 in shorter (180.0 in vs 180.4 in)
- Width: Chevrolet Cobalt is 1.5 in narrower (69.4 in vs 67.9 in)
- Height: Mitsubishi Lancer is 2.2 in taller (58.5 in vs 56.3 in)
- Wheelbase: Mitsubishi Lancer has a 0.4 in longer wheelbase (103.7 in vs 103.3 in)
- Curb weight: Mitsubishi Lancer is 340 lb heavier (3,164 lb vs 2,824 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: Mitsubishi Lancer is 340 lb heavier (3,164 lb vs 2,824 lb)
- Height: Mitsubishi Lancer is 2.2 in taller (58.5 in vs 56.3 in)
- Width: Chevrolet Cobalt is 1.5 in narrower (69.4 in vs 67.9 in)
- Wheelbase: Mitsubishi Lancer has a 0.4 in longer wheelbase (103.7 in vs 103.3 in)
- Length: Mitsubishi Lancer is 0.4 in shorter (180.0 in vs 180.4 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageMitsubishi Lancer — Mitsubishi Lancer is shorter by 0.4 in Check garage fit for Mitsubishi Lancer · garage fit for Chevrolet Cobalt
- Narrower for tight parkingChevrolet Cobalt — Chevrolet Cobalt is narrower by 1.5 in
- Smaller exterior footprintChevrolet Cobalt — Based on length × width (Chevrolet Cobalt)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Mitsubishi Lancer | Chevrolet Cobalt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 180.0 in | 180.4 in | 0.4 in |
| Width | 69.4 in | 67.9 in | 1.5 in |
| Height | 58.5 in | 56.3 in | 2.2 in |
| Wheelbase | 103.7 in | 103.3 in | 0.4 in |
| Curb weight | 3,164 lb | 2,824 lb | 340 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.