Mitsubishi Outlander vs Ford Flex Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2009 catalog dimensions. Mitsubishi Outlander · Ford Flex
- Length182.7 in
- Height67.7 in
- Wheelbase105.1 in
- Curb weight3,395 lb – 3,781 lb
- Width70.9 in
- Ford Flex width75.9 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Mitsubishi Outlander is 19.1 in shorter (182.7 in vs 201.8 in)
- Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 5.0 in narrower (70.9 in vs 75.9 in)
- Height: Ford Flex is 0.3 in taller (67.7 in vs 68.0 in)
- Wheelbase: Ford Flex has a 12.8 in longer wheelbase (105.1 in vs 117.9 in)
- Curb weight: Ford Flex is 966 lb heavier (3,588 lb vs 4,554 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: Ford Flex is 966 lb heavier (3,588 lb vs 4,554 lb)
- Wheelbase: Ford Flex has a 12.8 in longer wheelbase (105.1 in vs 117.9 in)
- Length: Mitsubishi Outlander is 19.1 in shorter (182.7 in vs 201.8 in)
- Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 5.0 in narrower (70.9 in vs 75.9 in)
- Height: Ford Flex is 0.3 in taller (67.7 in vs 68.0 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageMitsubishi Outlander — Mitsubishi Outlander is shorter by 19.1 in Check garage fit for Mitsubishi Outlander · garage fit for Ford Flex
- Narrower for tight parkingMitsubishi Outlander — Mitsubishi Outlander is narrower by 5.0 in
- Smaller exterior footprintMitsubishi Outlander — Based on length × width (Mitsubishi Outlander)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Mitsubishi Outlander | Ford Flex | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 182.7 in | 201.8 in | 19.1 in |
| Width | 70.9 in | 75.9 in | 5.0 in |
| Height | 67.7 in | 68.0 in | 0.3 in |
| Wheelbase | 105.1 in | 117.9 in | 12.8 in |
| Curb weight | 3,588 lb | 4,554 lb | 966 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.