Mitsubishi Outlander vs Honda CR-V Dimensions & Size Comparison

Comparing 2008 catalog dimensions. Mitsubishi Outlander · Honda CR-V

Same scale for both vehicles. Generic silhouette — proportional to measured length, height, width, wheelbase, and clearance.

Side view
  • Length182.7 in
  • Height67.7 in
  • Wheelbase105.1 in
  • Curb weight3,395 lb – 3,781 lb
Front / width
  • Width70.9 in
  • Honda CR-V width71.6 in

Which is bigger?

  • Length: Honda CR-V is 4.8 in shorter (182.7 in vs 177.9 in)
  • Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.7 in narrower (70.9 in vs 71.6 in)
  • Height: Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.6 in taller (67.7 in vs 66.1 in)
  • Wheelbase: Mitsubishi Outlander has a 2.0 in longer wheelbase (105.1 in vs 103.1 in)
  • Curb weight: Mitsubishi Outlander is 119 lb heavier (3,588 lb vs 3,469 lb)

Biggest size differences

  1. Curb weight: Mitsubishi Outlander is 119 lb heavier (3,588 lb vs 3,469 lb)
  2. Length: Honda CR-V is 4.8 in shorter (182.7 in vs 177.9 in)
  3. Height: Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.6 in taller (67.7 in vs 66.1 in)
  4. Wheelbase: Mitsubishi Outlander has a 2.0 in longer wheelbase (105.1 in vs 103.1 in)
  5. Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.7 in narrower (70.9 in vs 71.6 in)

Practical verdicts

  • Easier to fit in a short garageHonda CR-VHonda CR-V is shorter by 4.8 in Check garage fit for Mitsubishi Outlander · garage fit for Honda CR-V
  • Narrower for tight parkingMitsubishi OutlanderMitsubishi Outlander is narrower by 0.7 in
  • Smaller exterior footprintHonda CR-VBased on length × width (Honda CR-V)

Dimension comparison

SpecMitsubishi OutlanderHonda CR-VDifference
Length182.7 in177.9 in4.8 in
Width70.9 in71.6 in0.7 in
Height67.7 in66.1 in1.6 in
Wheelbase105.1 in103.1 in2.0 in
Curb weight3,588 lb3,469 lb119 lb

Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.

Compare by year

Overlapping model years with dimension data.

Already own one of these cars?

Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.

Related comparisons