Mitsubishi Outlander vs Jeep Wrangler Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2003 catalog dimensions. Mitsubishi Outlander · Jeep Wrangler
- Length179.1 in
- Height63.4 in – 66.3 in
- Wheelbase103.3 in
- Curb weight3,240 lb – 3,461 lb
- Width68.9 in
- Jeep Wrangler width66.7 in – 68.2 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Jeep Wrangler is 23.3 in shorter (179.1 in vs 155.8 in)
- Width: Jeep Wrangler is 1.5 in narrower (68.9 in vs 67.5 in)
- Height: Jeep Wrangler is 5.9 in taller (64.8 in vs 70.8 in)
- Wheelbase: Mitsubishi Outlander has a 9.9 in longer wheelbase (103.3 in vs 93.4 in)
- Curb weight: Jeep Wrangler is 125 lb heavier (3,351 lb vs 3,476 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Length: Jeep Wrangler is 23.3 in shorter (179.1 in vs 155.8 in)
- Wheelbase: Mitsubishi Outlander has a 9.9 in longer wheelbase (103.3 in vs 93.4 in)
- Height: Jeep Wrangler is 5.9 in taller (64.8 in vs 70.8 in)
- Curb weight: Jeep Wrangler is 125 lb heavier (3,351 lb vs 3,476 lb)
- Width: Jeep Wrangler is 1.5 in narrower (68.9 in vs 67.5 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageJeep Wrangler — Jeep Wrangler is shorter by 23.3 in Check garage fit for Mitsubishi Outlander · garage fit for Jeep Wrangler
- Narrower for tight parkingJeep Wrangler — Jeep Wrangler is narrower by 1.5 in
- Smaller exterior footprintJeep Wrangler — Based on length × width (Jeep Wrangler)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Mitsubishi Outlander | Jeep Wrangler | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 179.1 in | 155.8 in | 23.3 in |
| Width | 68.9 in | 67.5 in | 1.5 in |
| Height | 64.8 in | 70.8 in | 5.9 in |
| Wheelbase | 103.3 in | 93.4 in | 9.9 in |
| Ground clearance | — | 10.2 in | — |
| Curb weight | 3,351 lb | 3,476 lb | 125 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.