Mitsubishi Outlander vs Mazda CX-9 Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2010 catalog dimensions. Mitsubishi Outlander · Mazda CX-9
- Length183.7 in
- Height66.1 in
- Wheelbase105.1 in
- Curb weight3,384 lb – 3,780 lb
- Width70.9 in
- Mazda CX-9 width76.2 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Mitsubishi Outlander is 16.5 in shorter (183.7 in vs 200.2 in)
- Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 5.3 in narrower (70.9 in vs 76.2 in)
- Height: Mazda CX-9 is 1.9 in taller (66.1 in vs 68.0 in)
- Wheelbase: Mazda CX-9 has a 8.1 in longer wheelbase (105.1 in vs 113.2 in)
- Curb weight: Mazda CX-9 is 856 lb heavier (3,582 lb vs 4,438 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: Mazda CX-9 is 856 lb heavier (3,582 lb vs 4,438 lb)
- Length: Mitsubishi Outlander is 16.5 in shorter (183.7 in vs 200.2 in)
- Wheelbase: Mazda CX-9 has a 8.1 in longer wheelbase (105.1 in vs 113.2 in)
- Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 5.3 in narrower (70.9 in vs 76.2 in)
- Height: Mazda CX-9 is 1.9 in taller (66.1 in vs 68.0 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageMitsubishi Outlander — Mitsubishi Outlander is shorter by 16.5 in Check garage fit for Mitsubishi Outlander · garage fit for Mazda CX-9
- Narrower for tight parkingMitsubishi Outlander — Mitsubishi Outlander is narrower by 5.3 in
- Smaller exterior footprintMitsubishi Outlander — Based on length × width (Mitsubishi Outlander)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Mitsubishi Outlander | Mazda CX-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 183.7 in | 200.2 in | 16.5 in |
| Width | 70.9 in | 76.2 in | 5.3 in |
| Height | 66.1 in | 68.0 in | 1.9 in |
| Wheelbase | 105.1 in | 113.2 in | 8.1 in |
| Ground clearance | — | 8.0 in | — |
| Curb weight | 3,582 lb | 4,438 lb | 856 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.