Mitsubishi Outlander vs Mazda CX-9 Dimensions & Size Comparison

Comparing 2016 catalog dimensions. Mitsubishi Outlander · Mazda CX-9

Same scale for both vehicles. Generic silhouette — proportional to measured length, height, width, wheelbase, and clearance.

Side view
  • Length184.8 in
  • Height66.1 in
  • Wheelbase105.1 in
  • Ground clearance8.5 in – 9.0 in
  • Curb weight3,318 lb – 3,593 lb
Front / width
  • Width71.3 in

Which is bigger?

  • Length: Mitsubishi Outlander is 14.6 in shorter (184.8 in vs 199.4 in)
  • Wheelbase: Mazda CX-9 has a 10.2 in longer wheelbase (105.1 in vs 115.3 in)
  • Ground clearance: Mazda CX-9 has 0.1 in more ground clearance (8.8 in vs 8.8 in)
  • Curb weight: Mazda CX-9 is 947 lb heavier (3,456 lb vs 4,403 lb)

Biggest size differences

  1. Curb weight: Mazda CX-9 is 947 lb heavier (3,456 lb vs 4,403 lb)
  2. Wheelbase: Mazda CX-9 has a 10.2 in longer wheelbase (105.1 in vs 115.3 in)
  3. Length: Mitsubishi Outlander is 14.6 in shorter (184.8 in vs 199.4 in)
  4. Ground clearance: Mazda CX-9 has 0.1 in more ground clearance (8.8 in vs 8.8 in)

Practical verdicts

  • Easier to fit in a short garageMitsubishi Outlander — Mitsubishi Outlander is shorter by 14.6 in
  • More ground clearanceMazda CX-9 — Mazda CX-9 has 0.1 in more clearance

Dimension comparison

SpecMitsubishi OutlanderMazda CX-9Difference
Length184.8 in199.4 in14.6 in
Width71.3 in——
Height66.1 in——
Wheelbase105.1 in115.3 in10.2 in
Ground clearance8.8 in8.8 in0.1 in
Curb weight3,456 lb4,403 lb947 lb

Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.

Compare by year

Overlapping model years with dimension data.

Already own one of these cars?

Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.