Mitsubishi Outlander vs Subaru Outback Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2003 catalog dimensions. Mitsubishi Outlander · Subaru Outback
- Length179.1 in
- Height63.4 in – 66.3 in
- Wheelbase103.3 in
- Curb weight3,240 lb – 3,461 lb
- Width68.9 in
- Subaru Outback width68.7 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Mitsubishi Outlander is 6.8 in shorter (179.1 in vs 185.9 in)
- Width: Subaru Outback is 0.2 in narrower (68.9 in vs 68.7 in)
- Height: Mitsubishi Outlander is 4.0 in taller (64.8 in vs 60.8 in)
- Wheelbase: Subaru Outback has a 1.0 in longer wheelbase (103.3 in vs 104.3 in)
- Curb weight: Subaru Outback is 222 lb heavier (3,351 lb vs 3,573 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Height: Mitsubishi Outlander is 4.0 in taller (64.8 in vs 60.8 in)
- Curb weight: Subaru Outback is 222 lb heavier (3,351 lb vs 3,573 lb)
- Length: Mitsubishi Outlander is 6.8 in shorter (179.1 in vs 185.9 in)
- Wheelbase: Subaru Outback has a 1.0 in longer wheelbase (103.3 in vs 104.3 in)
- Width: Subaru Outback is 0.2 in narrower (68.9 in vs 68.7 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageMitsubishi Outlander — Mitsubishi Outlander is shorter by 6.8 in Check garage fit for Mitsubishi Outlander · garage fit for Subaru Outback
- Narrower for tight parkingSubaru Outback — Subaru Outback is narrower by 0.2 in
- Smaller exterior footprintMitsubishi Outlander — Based on length × width (Mitsubishi Outlander)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Mitsubishi Outlander | Subaru Outback | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 179.1 in | 185.9 in | 6.8 in |
| Width | 68.9 in | 68.7 in | 0.2 in |
| Height | 64.8 in | 60.8 in | 4.0 in |
| Wheelbase | 103.3 in | 104.3 in | 1.0 in |
| Curb weight | 3,351 lb | 3,573 lb | 222 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.