Mitsubishi Outlander vs Toyota 4Runner Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2003 catalog dimensions. Mitsubishi Outlander · Toyota 4Runner
- Length179.1 in
- Height63.4 in – 66.3 in
- Wheelbase103.3 in
- Curb weight3,240 lb – 3,461 lb
- Width68.9 in
- Toyota 4Runner width73.8 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Mitsubishi Outlander is 9.9 in shorter (179.1 in vs 189.0 in)
- Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 4.9 in narrower (68.9 in vs 73.8 in)
- Height: Toyota 4Runner is 5.4 in taller (64.8 in vs 70.3 in)
- Wheelbase: Toyota 4Runner has a 6.5 in longer wheelbase (103.3 in vs 109.8 in)
- Curb weight: Toyota 4Runner is 887 lb heavier (3,351 lb vs 4,238 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: Toyota 4Runner is 887 lb heavier (3,351 lb vs 4,238 lb)
- Height: Toyota 4Runner is 5.4 in taller (64.8 in vs 70.3 in)
- Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 4.9 in narrower (68.9 in vs 73.8 in)
- Wheelbase: Toyota 4Runner has a 6.5 in longer wheelbase (103.3 in vs 109.8 in)
- Length: Mitsubishi Outlander is 9.9 in shorter (179.1 in vs 189.0 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageMitsubishi Outlander — Mitsubishi Outlander is shorter by 9.9 in Check garage fit for Mitsubishi Outlander · garage fit for Toyota 4Runner
- Narrower for tight parkingMitsubishi Outlander — Mitsubishi Outlander is narrower by 4.9 in
- Smaller exterior footprintMitsubishi Outlander — Based on length × width (Mitsubishi Outlander)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Mitsubishi Outlander | Toyota 4Runner | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 179.1 in | 189.0 in | 9.9 in |
| Width | 68.9 in | 73.8 in | 4.9 in |
| Height | 64.8 in | 70.3 in | 5.4 in |
| Wheelbase | 103.3 in | 109.8 in | 6.5 in |
| Curb weight | 3,351 lb | 4,238 lb | 887 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.