Subaru Forester vs Mitsubishi Outlander Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2003 catalog dimensions. Subaru Forester · Mitsubishi Outlander
- Length175.2 in
- Height65.0 in
- Wheelbase99.4 in
- Curb weight3,090 lb – 3,095 lb
- Width68.1 in
- Mitsubishi Outlander width68.9 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Subaru Forester is 3.9 in shorter (175.2 in vs 179.1 in)
- Width: Subaru Forester is 0.8 in narrower (68.1 in vs 68.9 in)
- Height: Subaru Forester is 0.2 in taller (65.0 in vs 64.8 in)
- Wheelbase: Mitsubishi Outlander has a 3.9 in longer wheelbase (99.4 in vs 103.3 in)
- Curb weight: Mitsubishi Outlander is 258 lb heavier (3,093 lb vs 3,351 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: Mitsubishi Outlander is 258 lb heavier (3,093 lb vs 3,351 lb)
- Wheelbase: Mitsubishi Outlander has a 3.9 in longer wheelbase (99.4 in vs 103.3 in)
- Length: Subaru Forester is 3.9 in shorter (175.2 in vs 179.1 in)
- Width: Subaru Forester is 0.8 in narrower (68.1 in vs 68.9 in)
- Height: Subaru Forester is 0.2 in taller (65.0 in vs 64.8 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageSubaru Forester — Subaru Forester is shorter by 3.9 in Check garage fit for Subaru Forester · garage fit for Mitsubishi Outlander
- Narrower for tight parkingSubaru Forester — Subaru Forester is narrower by 0.8 in
- Smaller exterior footprintSubaru Forester — Based on length × width (Subaru Forester)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Subaru Forester | Mitsubishi Outlander | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 175.2 in | 179.1 in | 3.9 in |
| Width | 68.1 in | 68.9 in | 0.8 in |
| Height | 65.0 in | 64.8 in | 0.2 in |
| Wheelbase | 99.4 in | 103.3 in | 3.9 in |
| Curb weight | 3,093 lb | 3,351 lb | 258 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.