Toyota 4Runner vs Ford Expedition Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2003 catalog dimensions. Toyota 4Runner · Ford Expedition
- Length189.0 in
- Height68.9 in – 71.6 in
- Wheelbase109.8 in
- Curb weight4,025 lb – 4,450 lb
- Width73.8 in
- Ford Expedition width78.7 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Toyota 4Runner is 16.8 in shorter (189.0 in vs 205.8 in)
- Width: Toyota 4Runner is 4.9 in narrower (73.8 in vs 78.7 in)
- Height: Ford Expedition is 7.3 in taller (70.3 in vs 77.6 in)
- Wheelbase: Ford Expedition has a 9.2 in longer wheelbase (109.8 in vs 119.0 in)
- Curb weight: Ford Expedition is 1,239 lb heavier (4,238 lb vs 5,477 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: Ford Expedition is 1,239 lb heavier (4,238 lb vs 5,477 lb)
- Height: Ford Expedition is 7.3 in taller (70.3 in vs 77.6 in)
- Length: Toyota 4Runner is 16.8 in shorter (189.0 in vs 205.8 in)
- Wheelbase: Ford Expedition has a 9.2 in longer wheelbase (109.8 in vs 119.0 in)
- Width: Toyota 4Runner is 4.9 in narrower (73.8 in vs 78.7 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageToyota 4Runner — Toyota 4Runner is shorter by 16.8 in Check garage fit for Toyota 4Runner · garage fit for Ford Expedition
- Narrower for tight parkingToyota 4Runner — Toyota 4Runner is narrower by 4.9 in
- Smaller exterior footprintToyota 4Runner — Based on length × width (Toyota 4Runner)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Toyota 4Runner | Ford Expedition | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 189.0 in | 205.8 in | 16.8 in |
| Width | 73.8 in | 78.7 in | 4.9 in |
| Height | 70.3 in | 77.6 in | 7.3 in |
| Wheelbase | 109.8 in | 119.0 in | 9.2 in |
| Curb weight | 4,238 lb | 5,477 lb | 1,239 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.