Toyota 4Runner vs Mitsubishi Outlander Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2003 catalog dimensions. Toyota 4Runner · Mitsubishi Outlander
- Length189.0 in
- Height68.9 in – 71.6 in
- Wheelbase109.8 in
- Curb weight4,025 lb – 4,450 lb
- Width73.8 in
- Mitsubishi Outlander width68.9 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Mitsubishi Outlander is 9.9 in shorter (189.0 in vs 179.1 in)
- Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 4.9 in narrower (73.8 in vs 68.9 in)
- Height: Toyota 4Runner is 5.4 in taller (70.3 in vs 64.8 in)
- Wheelbase: Toyota 4Runner has a 6.5 in longer wheelbase (109.8 in vs 103.3 in)
- Curb weight: Toyota 4Runner is 887 lb heavier (4,238 lb vs 3,351 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: Toyota 4Runner is 887 lb heavier (4,238 lb vs 3,351 lb)
- Height: Toyota 4Runner is 5.4 in taller (70.3 in vs 64.8 in)
- Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 4.9 in narrower (73.8 in vs 68.9 in)
- Wheelbase: Toyota 4Runner has a 6.5 in longer wheelbase (109.8 in vs 103.3 in)
- Length: Mitsubishi Outlander is 9.9 in shorter (189.0 in vs 179.1 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageMitsubishi Outlander — Mitsubishi Outlander is shorter by 9.9 in Check garage fit for Toyota 4Runner · garage fit for Mitsubishi Outlander
- Narrower for tight parkingMitsubishi Outlander — Mitsubishi Outlander is narrower by 4.9 in
- Smaller exterior footprintMitsubishi Outlander — Based on length × width (Mitsubishi Outlander)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Toyota 4Runner | Mitsubishi Outlander | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 189.0 in | 179.1 in | 9.9 in |
| Width | 73.8 in | 68.9 in | 4.9 in |
| Height | 70.3 in | 64.8 in | 5.4 in |
| Wheelbase | 109.8 in | 103.3 in | 6.5 in |
| Curb weight | 4,238 lb | 3,351 lb | 887 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.