Toyota 4Runner vs Mitsubishi Outlander Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2010 catalog dimensions. Toyota 4Runner · Mitsubishi Outlander
- Length189.9 in
- Height71.5 in
- Wheelbase109.8 in
- Curb weight4,295 lb – 4,805 lb
- Width75.2 in
- Mitsubishi Outlander width70.9 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Mitsubishi Outlander is 6.2 in shorter (189.9 in vs 183.7 in)
- Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 4.3 in narrower (75.2 in vs 70.9 in)
- Height: Toyota 4Runner is 5.4 in taller (71.5 in vs 66.1 in)
- Wheelbase: Toyota 4Runner has a 4.7 in longer wheelbase (109.8 in vs 105.1 in)
- Curb weight: Toyota 4Runner is 968 lb heavier (4,550 lb vs 3,582 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: Toyota 4Runner is 968 lb heavier (4,550 lb vs 3,582 lb)
- Height: Toyota 4Runner is 5.4 in taller (71.5 in vs 66.1 in)
- Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 4.3 in narrower (75.2 in vs 70.9 in)
- Wheelbase: Toyota 4Runner has a 4.7 in longer wheelbase (109.8 in vs 105.1 in)
- Length: Mitsubishi Outlander is 6.2 in shorter (189.9 in vs 183.7 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageMitsubishi Outlander — Mitsubishi Outlander is shorter by 6.2 in Check garage fit for Toyota 4Runner · garage fit for Mitsubishi Outlander
- Narrower for tight parkingMitsubishi Outlander — Mitsubishi Outlander is narrower by 4.3 in
- Smaller exterior footprintMitsubishi Outlander — Based on length × width (Mitsubishi Outlander)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Toyota 4Runner | Mitsubishi Outlander | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 189.9 in | 183.7 in | 6.2 in |
| Width | 75.2 in | 70.9 in | 4.3 in |
| Height | 71.5 in | 66.1 in | 5.4 in |
| Wheelbase | 109.8 in | 105.1 in | 4.7 in |
| Curb weight | 4,550 lb | 3,582 lb | 968 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.