Volvo XC60 vs Mitsubishi Outlander Dimensions & Size Comparison

Comparing 2010 catalog dimensions. Volvo XC60 · Mitsubishi Outlander

Same scale for both vehicles. Generic silhouette — proportional to measured length, height, width, wheelbase, and clearance.

Side view
  • Length182.2 in
  • Height67.4 in
  • Wheelbase109.2 in
  • Curb weight4,012 lb – 4,174 lb
Front / width
  • Width74.4 in
  • Mitsubishi Outlander width70.9 in

Which is bigger?

  • Length: Volvo XC60 is 1.5 in shorter (182.2 in vs 183.7 in)
  • Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 3.5 in narrower (74.4 in vs 70.9 in)
  • Height: Volvo XC60 is 1.3 in taller (67.4 in vs 66.1 in)
  • Wheelbase: Volvo XC60 has a 4.1 in longer wheelbase (109.2 in vs 105.1 in)
  • Curb weight: Volvo XC60 is 511 lb heavier (4,093 lb vs 3,582 lb)

Biggest size differences

  1. Curb weight: Volvo XC60 is 511 lb heavier (4,093 lb vs 3,582 lb)
  2. Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 3.5 in narrower (74.4 in vs 70.9 in)
  3. Wheelbase: Volvo XC60 has a 4.1 in longer wheelbase (109.2 in vs 105.1 in)
  4. Height: Volvo XC60 is 1.3 in taller (67.4 in vs 66.1 in)
  5. Length: Volvo XC60 is 1.5 in shorter (182.2 in vs 183.7 in)

Practical verdicts

  • Easier to fit in a short garageVolvo XC60 — Volvo XC60 is shorter by 1.5 in Check garage fit for Volvo XC60 · garage fit for Mitsubishi Outlander
  • Narrower for tight parkingMitsubishi Outlander — Mitsubishi Outlander is narrower by 3.5 in
  • Smaller exterior footprintMitsubishi Outlander — Based on length × width (Mitsubishi Outlander)

Dimension comparison

SpecVolvo XC60Mitsubishi OutlanderDifference
Length182.2 in183.7 in1.5 in
Width74.4 in70.9 in3.5 in
Height67.4 in66.1 in1.3 in
Wheelbase109.2 in105.1 in4.1 in
Curb weight4,093 lb3,582 lb511 lb

Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.

Compare by year

Overlapping model years with dimension data.

Already own one of these cars?

Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.