Volvo XC60 vs Mitsubishi Outlander Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2010 catalog dimensions. Volvo XC60 · Mitsubishi Outlander
- Length182.2 in
- Height67.4 in
- Wheelbase109.2 in
- Curb weight4,012 lb – 4,174 lb
- Width74.4 in
- Mitsubishi Outlander width70.9 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Volvo XC60 is 1.5 in shorter (182.2 in vs 183.7 in)
- Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 3.5 in narrower (74.4 in vs 70.9 in)
- Height: Volvo XC60 is 1.3 in taller (67.4 in vs 66.1 in)
- Wheelbase: Volvo XC60 has a 4.1 in longer wheelbase (109.2 in vs 105.1 in)
- Curb weight: Volvo XC60 is 511 lb heavier (4,093 lb vs 3,582 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: Volvo XC60 is 511 lb heavier (4,093 lb vs 3,582 lb)
- Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 3.5 in narrower (74.4 in vs 70.9 in)
- Wheelbase: Volvo XC60 has a 4.1 in longer wheelbase (109.2 in vs 105.1 in)
- Height: Volvo XC60 is 1.3 in taller (67.4 in vs 66.1 in)
- Length: Volvo XC60 is 1.5 in shorter (182.2 in vs 183.7 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageVolvo XC60 — Volvo XC60 is shorter by 1.5 in Check garage fit for Volvo XC60 · garage fit for Mitsubishi Outlander
- Narrower for tight parkingMitsubishi Outlander — Mitsubishi Outlander is narrower by 3.5 in
- Smaller exterior footprintMitsubishi Outlander — Based on length × width (Mitsubishi Outlander)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Volvo XC60 | Mitsubishi Outlander | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 182.2 in | 183.7 in | 1.5 in |
| Width | 74.4 in | 70.9 in | 3.5 in |
| Height | 67.4 in | 66.1 in | 1.3 in |
| Wheelbase | 109.2 in | 105.1 in | 4.1 in |
| Curb weight | 4,093 lb | 3,582 lb | 511 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.