Volvo XC60 vs Mitsubishi Outlander Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2019 catalog dimensions. Volvo XC60 · Mitsubishi Outlander
- Length184.6 in
- Height65.3 in
- Wheelbase112.8 in
- Ground clearance8.5 in
- Curb weight4,105 lb – 4,199 lb
- Width74.9 in
- Mitsubishi Outlander width71.3 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Volvo XC60 is 0.2 in shorter (184.6 in vs 184.8 in)
- Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 3.6 in narrower (74.9 in vs 71.3 in)
- Height: Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.8 in taller (65.3 in vs 66.1 in)
- Wheelbase: Volvo XC60 has a 7.7 in longer wheelbase (112.8 in vs 105.1 in)
- Ground clearance: essentially the same
- Curb weight: Volvo XC60 is 664 lb heavier (4,152 lb vs 3,489 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: Volvo XC60 is 664 lb heavier (4,152 lb vs 3,489 lb)
- Wheelbase: Volvo XC60 has a 7.7 in longer wheelbase (112.8 in vs 105.1 in)
- Width: Mitsubishi Outlander is 3.6 in narrower (74.9 in vs 71.3 in)
- Height: Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.8 in taller (65.3 in vs 66.1 in)
- Length: Volvo XC60 is 0.2 in shorter (184.6 in vs 184.8 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageVolvo XC60 — Volvo XC60 is shorter by 0.2 in Check garage fit for Volvo XC60 · garage fit for Mitsubishi Outlander
- Narrower for tight parkingMitsubishi Outlander — Mitsubishi Outlander is narrower by 3.6 in
- Smaller exterior footprintMitsubishi Outlander — Based on length × width (Mitsubishi Outlander)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Volvo XC60 | Mitsubishi Outlander | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 184.6 in | 184.8 in | 0.2 in |
| Width | 74.9 in | 71.3 in | 3.6 in |
| Height | 65.3 in | 66.1 in | 0.8 in |
| Wheelbase | 112.8 in | 105.1 in | 7.7 in |
| Ground clearance | 8.5 in | 8.5 in | 0.0 in |
| Curb weight | 4,152 lb | 3,489 lb | 664 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.