Volvo XC90 vs Mazda CX-9 Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2009 catalog dimensions. Volvo XC90 · Mazda CX-9
- Length189.3 in
- Height70.2 in
- Wheelbase112.6 in
- Curb weight4,450 lb – 4,826 lb
- Width74.7 in
- Mazda CX-9 width76.2 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Volvo XC90 is 10.5 in shorter (189.3 in vs 199.8 in)
- Width: Volvo XC90 is 1.5 in narrower (74.7 in vs 76.2 in)
- Height: Volvo XC90 is 2.2 in taller (70.2 in vs 68.0 in)
- Wheelbase: Mazda CX-9 has a 0.6 in longer wheelbase (112.6 in vs 113.2 in)
- Curb weight: Volvo XC90 is 196 lb heavier (4,638 lb vs 4,442 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Length: Volvo XC90 is 10.5 in shorter (189.3 in vs 199.8 in)
- Curb weight: Volvo XC90 is 196 lb heavier (4,638 lb vs 4,442 lb)
- Height: Volvo XC90 is 2.2 in taller (70.2 in vs 68.0 in)
- Width: Volvo XC90 is 1.5 in narrower (74.7 in vs 76.2 in)
- Wheelbase: Mazda CX-9 has a 0.6 in longer wheelbase (112.6 in vs 113.2 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageVolvo XC90 — Volvo XC90 is shorter by 10.5 in Check garage fit for Volvo XC90 · garage fit for Mazda CX-9
- Narrower for tight parkingVolvo XC90 — Volvo XC90 is narrower by 1.5 in
- Smaller exterior footprintVolvo XC90 — Based on length × width (Volvo XC90)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Volvo XC90 | Mazda CX-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 189.3 in | 199.8 in | 10.5 in |
| Width | 74.7 in | 76.2 in | 1.5 in |
| Height | 70.2 in | 68.0 in | 2.2 in |
| Wheelbase | 112.6 in | 113.2 in | 0.6 in |
| Ground clearance | — | 8.0 in | — |
| Curb weight | 4,638 lb | 4,442 lb | 196 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range.
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.