Cadillac CTS vs Lincoln MKZ Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2012 catalog dimensions. Cadillac CTS · Lincoln MKZ
- Length188.5 in – 192.0 in
- Height56.0 in – 58.0 in
- Wheelbase113.4 in
- Curb weight3,849 lb – 4,306 lb
- Width72.5 in – 74.1 in
- Lincoln MKZ width72.2 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Lincoln MKZ is 0.4 in shorter (190.3 in vs 189.8 in)
- Width: Lincoln MKZ is 1.1 in narrower (73.3 in vs 72.2 in)
- Height: Cadillac CTS is 0.1 in taller (57.0 in vs 56.9 in)
- Wheelbase: Cadillac CTS has a 6.0 in longer wheelbase (113.4 in vs 107.4 in)
- Curb weight: Cadillac CTS is 381 lb heavier (4,078 lb vs 3,697 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: Cadillac CTS is 381 lb heavier (4,078 lb vs 3,697 lb)
- Wheelbase: Cadillac CTS has a 6.0 in longer wheelbase (113.4 in vs 107.4 in)
- Width: Lincoln MKZ is 1.1 in narrower (73.3 in vs 72.2 in)
- Length: Lincoln MKZ is 0.4 in shorter (190.3 in vs 189.8 in)
- Height: Cadillac CTS is 0.1 in taller (57.0 in vs 56.9 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageLincoln MKZ — Lincoln MKZ is shorter by 0.4 in Check garage fit for Cadillac CTS · garage fit for Lincoln MKZ
- Narrower for tight parkingLincoln MKZ — Lincoln MKZ is narrower by 1.1 in
- Smaller exterior footprintLincoln MKZ — Based on length × width (Lincoln MKZ)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Cadillac CTS | Lincoln MKZ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 190.3 in | 189.8 in | 0.4 in |
| Width | 73.3 in | 72.2 in | 1.1 in |
| Height | 57.0 in | 56.9 in | 0.1 in |
| Wheelbase | 113.4 in | 107.4 in | 6.0 in |
| Curb weight | 4,078 lb | 3,697 lb | 381 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range (e.g. length 188.5 in – 192.0 in).
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.