Ford Ranger vs Chrysler Pacifica Dimensions & Size Comparison
Comparing 2006 catalog dimensions. Ford Ranger · Chrysler Pacifica
- Length188.5 in – 202.9 in
- Height66.2 in – 69.4 in
- Wheelbase111.6 in – 125.7 in
- Curb weight3,028 lb – 3,606 lb
- Width69.4 in – 70.3 in
- Chrysler Pacifica width79.3 in
Which is bigger?
- Length: Ford Ranger is 3.2 in shorter (195.7 in vs 198.9 in)
- Width: Ford Ranger is 9.5 in narrower (69.8 in vs 79.3 in)
- Height: Ford Ranger is 1.3 in taller (67.8 in vs 66.5 in)
- Wheelbase: Ford Ranger has a 2.4 in longer wheelbase (118.7 in vs 116.3 in)
- Curb weight: Chrysler Pacifica is 1,262 lb heavier (3,317 lb vs 4,579 lb)
Biggest size differences
- Curb weight: Chrysler Pacifica is 1,262 lb heavier (3,317 lb vs 4,579 lb)
- Width: Ford Ranger is 9.5 in narrower (69.8 in vs 79.3 in)
- Wheelbase: Ford Ranger has a 2.4 in longer wheelbase (118.7 in vs 116.3 in)
- Height: Ford Ranger is 1.3 in taller (67.8 in vs 66.5 in)
- Length: Ford Ranger is 3.2 in shorter (195.7 in vs 198.9 in)
Practical verdicts
- Easier to fit in a short garageFord Ranger — Ford Ranger is shorter by 3.2 in Check garage fit for Ford Ranger · garage fit for Chrysler Pacifica
- Narrower for tight parkingFord Ranger — Ford Ranger is narrower by 9.5 in
- Smaller exterior footprintFord Ranger — Based on length × width (Ford Ranger)
Dimension comparison
| Spec | Ford Ranger | Chrysler Pacifica | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 195.7 in | 198.9 in | 3.2 in |
| Width | 69.8 in | 79.3 in | 9.5 in |
| Height | 67.8 in | 66.5 in | 1.3 in |
| Wheelbase | 118.7 in | 116.3 in | 2.4 in |
| Ground clearance | — | 5.9 in | — |
| Curb weight | 3,317 lb | 4,579 lb | 1,262 lb |
Values use trim midpoints when a model year lists a range (e.g. length 188.5 in – 202.9 in).
Compare by year
Overlapping model years with dimension data.
Already own one of these cars?
Jump to maintenance sizes on the vehicle page — tires, wipers, battery, and oil when present in the catalog.